Fourth Year. Senior Year. Year of the Rat; far from the first-year proles in the echoing cattle-chamber that was Introduction to Cultural Studies. Time to do good works, mind-trooper. You are now an epistemological apostle, teasing some practical application out of the grayer areas of political and philosophical morality.
Actually, fuckwit, your life is now small rooms of people devoted to proving they feel a book called Minima Moralia deeper in their balls than each other. So buckle up: invisible scare-quotes will bounce pointlessly off of one another; throats will be brusquely cleared; recommendations to Vassar will be signed. And somewhere, high up in heaven, Athena will weep inconsolably into her cloud-pillows. For better or for worse, the rest of the universe will remain generally unaffected.
Have a seat. The man (and it will be a man) in his early thirties wearing an aggressively casual t-shirt would be your professor. He is the master of ceremonies for this quietly informed circus of logic. His job is to vibe on continental philosophy thrice-removed from material reality, and then to try to relate it to a forty-five second clip from an HBO action-drama. Your job is to justify the past nine years of his life. You do this by trying to make statements in the interrogative, again and again and again? Here’s some
Tips, tips, tips!!!:
1. Use subtle scare quotes.
“Air quotes” are for people who haven’t read Of Grammatology in French. The new scare quotes involve harnessing the minutiae of your sunken, guilty face. Just pause after speaking and purse your lips together, as if you just bit a sour patch key into the shape of a question mark.
2. Cite the incomprehensibility of the Holocaust.
If you’re ever asked for clarification, just explain that whatever point you just made is profoundly inexplicable, kind of like, oh, I don’t know…the Holocaust? Since most of the philosophy you’ll be reading will be tangentially related to the Holocaust anyway, it should almost seem relevant to your point.
But your point is besides the point. By bringing the H-bomb into the mix, you no longer have to defend your position. It’s out of your hands, out of the hands of all rational men and women. What are your classmates going to do: suggest that your point is comprehensible? What, comprehensible maybe like how the murder of six million Jews is comprehensible? Or maybe they’re suggesting it was less than six million? Eh, are they?
You piece of shit.
3. Pretend to read The New Republic, don’t say anything.
Just hunch over an article that takes an ambivalent stance on the divide between science and literature.
4. Drop out.
The best thing to do is get the fuck out of there before the opt-out deadline comes crashing down like a time-portcullis behind you. Because when that girl in a Mystery Train t-shirt, that girl whose upturned nose is a testament to the hidden truths of phrenology, when she stands up and asks why, why, goshdarnit why, “why can’t it all be theory?”1, chances are it will already be too late to believe in things again, and all your jokes will start to look like this:




